首页> 外文OA文献 >Frequency and change mechanisms of psychotherapy among depressed patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT
【2h】

Frequency and change mechanisms of psychotherapy among depressed patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT

机译:抑郁症患者心理治疗的频率和变化机制:一项多中心随机试验的研究方案,比较每周两次和每周一次的CBT和IPT

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (IPT) are among the most well established therapies for the treatment of depression. However, some major questions remain unanswered. First, it is unknown what session frequency results in the most optimal (cost) effectiveness in psychotherapy. Second, the debate as to what mechanisms underlie the effect of psychotherapy has not yet been resolved. Enhancing knowledge about the optimal session frequency and mechanisms of change seems crucial in order to optimize the (cost) effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression. This study aims to compare treatment outcome of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT. We expect twice-weekly sessions to be more effective and lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms in comparison to once-weekly sessions. Both therapy-specific and non-specific process measures will be included to unravel the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for depression. Besides the use of self-reports and behavioral observations, this study will also examine underlying biological processes by collecting blood samples. Method: In a multicenter randomized trial, two hundred depressed patients will be recruited from Dutch specialized mental healthcare centers and randomized into one of the following groups, all receiving a maximum of 20 sessions in different frequencies: a) twice-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, b) twice-weekly sessions at the start of IPT, c) once-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, d) once-weekly sessions at the start of IPT. Primary outcome measures are depression severity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. Process measures include therapeutic alliance, recall, therapy-specific skills, motivation and compliance. Assessments will take place during baseline, monthly during treatment and follow-up at month 9, 12 and 24. In addition, at 12 and 24 months, the frequency of depressive episodes in the previous year will be assessed. Blood samples will be taken pre- and post-treatment. The study has been ethically approved and registered. Discussion: Finding that twice-weekly sessions are more effective or lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms could lead to treatment adaptations that have the potential to reduce the personal and societal burden of depression. In addition, insight into the mechanisms of change and physiological processes in psychotherapy will enable us to optimize treatments and may help to understand human functioning beyond the context of treatment.
机译:背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)和人际关系疗法(IPT)是最成熟的抑郁症治疗方法。但是,一些主要问题仍然没有答案。首先,尚不清楚什么会话频率会导致心理治疗的最佳(成本)效果最佳。第二,关于心理治疗作用的潜在机制的争论尚未解决。为了优化抑郁症心理治疗的(成本)有效性,增强关于最佳疗程频率和变化机制的知识似乎至关重要。这项研究旨在比较每周两次和每周一次的CBT和IPT的治疗结果。与每周一次的疗程相比,我们希望每周两次的疗程更有效,并且可以更快地恢复抑郁症状。将包括针对治疗的过程和非针对过程的措施,以揭示抑郁症心理治疗变化的机制。除了使用自我报告和行为观察之外,本研究还将通过收集血液样本检查潜在的生物学过程。方法:在一项多中心随机试验中,将从荷兰专业精神卫生中心招募200名抑郁症患者,并随机分为以下一组,每组均接受不同频率的最多20次治疗:a)开始时每周两次CBT,b)IPT开始时每周两次,c)CBT开始时每周一次,d)IPT开始每周一次。主要结果指标是抑郁症的严重程度,成本效益和生活质量。过程措施包括治疗联盟,召回,治疗特定技能,动机和依从性。评估将在基线期间,治疗期间每月进行一次,并在第9、12和24个月进行随访。此外,在12和24个月时,将评估上一年抑郁发作的频率。血样将在治疗前和后进行。该研究已得到伦理批准和注册。讨论:发现每周两次的疗程更有效或导致抑郁症状的更快恢复可能会导致适应治疗,从而有可能减轻抑郁症的个人和社会负担。此外,深入了解心理疗法中的变化机制和生理过程将使我们能够优化治疗方法,并可能有助于了解治疗背景之外的人类功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号